<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:52:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<generator>Tattertools 1.0.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Court turns away PR congressional vote lawsuit</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-turns-away-PR-congressional-vote-lawsuit</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court won&#039;t hear an appeal from residents of Puerto Rico seeking to gain a voting representative in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court turned away the appeal from Gregorio Igartua and other Puerto Ricans on Monday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Territorial status grants residents of Puerto Rico U.S. citizenship, but they pay no federal income taxes and cannot vote in presidential elections. Their congressional representative also cannot vote in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal judge threw out the lawsuit, and the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision, saying that since Puerto Rico was not a state, it could not have a voting member of Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court refused to hear the appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/961</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-turns-away-PR-congressional-vote-lawsuit#entry961comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:49:09 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court says farmers must pay bankruptcy tax</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-says-farmers-must-pay-bankruptcy-tax</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court says a farming family has to pay tax on the bankruptcy sale of their farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court on Monday voted 5-4 for the IRS in its fight with Lynwood and Brenda Hall over their bankruptcy sale of their 320-acre farm in Willcox, Ariz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Halls were forced to sell their family farm for $960,000 to settle their bankruptcy debts. That sale brought about capital gains taxes of $26,000.The Halls wanted the taxes treated as part of the bankruptcy, paying part of it and having the court discharge the rest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IRS objected to that plan, saying all of the taxes must be paid and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco agreed with the tax agency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court agreed with that decision.</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/960</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-says-farmers-must-pay-bankruptcy-tax#entry960comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:48:55 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court won&#039;t hear appeals from Bulger victim family</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-wont-hear-appeals-from-Bulger-victim-family</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court won&#039;t hear an appeal over whether the family of a man allegedly killed by former Boston mob boss and FBI informant James &quot;Whitey&quot; Bulger should get millions of dollars from the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Edward Halloran&#039;s estate, which wants more than $2 million in damages from the FBI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulger and another gang member are alleged to have shot Halloran on the waterfront in 1982. Bulger was an FBI informant at the time, and two judges ordered the FBI to pay damages to the families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the families did not file their claims within the statute of limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>National News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/959</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-wont-hear-appeals-from-Bulger-victim-family#entry959comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:48:43 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court won&#039;t consider giving man new trial</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-wont-consider-giving-man-new-trial</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court won&#039;t consider giving a man convicted in the death of a Texas toddler a new trial because the medical examiner changed her opinion on the cause of death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Neil Hampton Robbins, convicted in the death of 17-month-old Tristen Skye Rivet, who died on May 12, 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the trial, Dr. Patricia Moore testified that Tristen&#039;s death was a homicide caused by asphyxia. But Moore later changed her opinion and said the cause of death was undetermined. Robbins asked for a new trial but the Texas Court of Criminal Appeal refused, saying there is no conclusive evidence of Robbins&#039; innocence and that it wasn&#039;t proven that the state purposefully used false testimony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>National News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/962</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-wont-consider-giving-man-new-trial#entry962comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 09:49:00 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court says illegal immigrants can&#039;t have guns</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-says-illegal-immigrants-cant-have-guns</link>
			<description>A federal appeals court says illegal immigrants don&#039;t have a right to own firearms under the U.S. Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emmanuel Huitron-Guizar of Wyoming pleaded guilty to being an illegal immigrant in possession of firearms after his arrest last year. He was ordered held by immigration authorities at the Natrona County Detention Center in Wyoming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An attorney for Huitron-Guizar appealed the case, saying illegal immigrants are not excluded from possessing firearms like felons and people who are mentally ill, and should have the same rights as U.S. citizens to buy a gun for hunting and protection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver ruled Monday that illegal immigrants have only limited protection under the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huitron-Guizar&#039;s attorney, Ronald Pretty of Cheyenne, Wyo., says he plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.</description>
			<category>Headline Legal News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/956</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-says-illegal-immigrants-cant-have-guns#entry956comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:19:08 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fed court reverses order for VA system overhaul</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Fed-court-reverses-order-for-VA-system-overhaul</link>
			<description>A federal appeals court on Monday reversed its demand that the Veterans Affairs Department dramatically overhaul its mental health care system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A special 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that any such changes need to be ordered by Congress or the president.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 10-1 ruling reversed an earlier decision by a three-judge panel of the same court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The May 2011 ruling had ordered the VA to ensure that suicidal vets are seen immediately, among other changes. It found the VA&#039;s &quot;unchecked incompetence&quot; in handling the flood of post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health claims was unconstitutional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new decision said courts are powerless to implement the fixes sought by two veterans groups that filed the lawsuit against the VA in 2007. The lawsuits alleged that hundreds of thousands of veterans had to wait an average of four years to fully receive the mental health benefits owed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;There can be no doubt that securing exemplary care for our nation&#039;s veterans is a moral imperative,&quot; Judge Jay Bybee wrote for the majority. &quot;But Congress and the president are in far better position&quot; to decide whether and what changes need to be done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Legal Events</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/957</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Fed-court-reverses-order-for-VA-system-overhaul#entry957comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 11:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Probation charge dropped against tanned NJ mom</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Probation-charge-dropped-against-tanned-NJ-mom</link>
			<description>Court officials say the New Jersey mom accused of taking her then-5-year-old daughter into a tanning booth is no longer on probation in a separate case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patricia Krentcil is free on $2,500 bond on the child endangerment charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The arrest in Nutley got the attention of authorities in Camden County. That&#039;s where Krentcil was sentenced to five years&#039; probation in 1999 for credit card theft, forgery and theft for writing bad checks. In 2001, a bench warrant was issued for her failure to appear at a probation hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Court officials in Camden County on Friday say her probation had been terminated and she would not be required to appear in court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Krentcil is due back in court next month in the tanning case. She says she never took her daughter into a booth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/958</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Probation-charge-dropped-against-tanned-NJ-mom#entry958comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 11:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lawyer enters not guilty plea for shooting suspect</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Lawyer-enters-not-guilty-plea-for-shooting-suspect</link>
			<description>A California man accused of committing the nation&#039;s deadliest school shooting rampage since the 2007 attack at Virginia Tech pleaded not guilty Monday to murder charges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One L. Goh, 43, entered his plea through his lawyer, Deputy Public Defender David Klaus in Alameda County Superior Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Goh is charged with seven counts of murder and three counts of attempted murder in the April 2 attack at Oikos University in Oakland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Klaus declined to comment after the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Goh also faces the special circumstance of committing multiple murders that makes him eligible for the death penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authorities said Goh planned the shootings and opened fire at the small Christian college founded to cater to Korean immigrants after becoming angry over a tuition dispute with school officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those killed were students Doris Chibuko, 40; Judith Seymour, 53; Grace EunHea Kim, 23; Lydia Sim, 21; Bhutia Tshering, 38; Sonam Choedon, 33; and secretary Katleen Ping, 24.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choedon&#039;s brother, Wangchen Nyima, attended Monday&#039;s hearing and said he wanted to see Goh in person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;I just want to know why this happened,&quot; Nyima said. &quot;He seems like he has his own problems. He seems like he&#039;s a psycho.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shackled and wearing a red jumpsuit, Goh appeared somewhat calm during his brief court hearing and was noticeably thinner than he was during his previous court appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A once heavyset man, Goh lost about 20 pounds in jail after he went on a self-imposed hunger strike, said sheriff&#039;s Sgt. J.D. Nelson. Goh inexplicably began eating again on Saturday, Nelson said.</description>
			<category>National News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/955</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Lawyer-enters-not-guilty-plea-for-shooting-suspect#entry955comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 10:04:22 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chinese court seeking to mediate iPad dispute</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Chinese-court-seeking-to-mediate-iPad-dispute</link>
			<description>A Chinese court is mediating between Apple Inc. and the Chinese company challenging its right to use the iPad trademark, seeking to get the companies to settle an awkward standoff over the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Guangdong High Court in southern China, is seeking to arrange a settlement, said Ma Dongxiao, a lawyer for Proview Electronics Co. The court on Feb. 29 began hearing Apple&#039;s appeal of lower court ruling that favored Proview in the trademark dispute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;It is likely that we will settle out of court. The Guangdong High Court is helping to arrange it and the court also expects to do so,&quot; Ma said Monday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China has sought to showcase its determination to protect trademarks and other intellectual property, but with hundreds of thousands employed in the assembly of Apple&#039;s iPhones and iPads is unlikely to want to disrupt the company&#039;s production and marketing in China.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/954</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Chinese-court-seeking-to-mediate-iPad-dispute#entry954comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:08:04 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>High court&#039;s stance could spur immigration laws</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/High-courts-stance-could-spur-immigration-laws</link>
			<description>Emboldened by signals that the U.S. Supreme Court may uphold parts of Arizona&#039;s immigration law, legislators and activists across the country say they are gearing up to push for similar get-tough measures in their states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;We&#039;re getting our national network ready to run with the ball, and saturate state legislatures with versions of the law,&quot; said William Gheen, president of Americans for Legal Immigration. &quot;We believe we can pass it in most states.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That goal may be a stretch, but lawmakers in about a dozen states told The Associated Press they were interested in proposing Arizona-style laws if its key components are upheld by the Supreme Court. A ruling is expected in June on the Department of Justice&#039;s appeal that the law conflicts with federal immigration policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, said he was encouraged that several justices suggested during Wednesday&#039;s oral arguments that they are ready to let Arizona enforce the most controversial part of its law — a requirement that police officers check the immigration status of people they suspect are in the country illegally. &lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>National News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/953</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/High-courts-stance-could-spur-immigration-laws#entry953comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:07:36 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

