<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:44:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<generator>Tattertools 1.0.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Md. highest court recognizes same-sex divorce</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Md-highest-court-recognizes-same-sex-divorce</link>
			<description>Maryland&#039;s highest court ruled Friday that same-sex couples can divorce in the state even though Maryland does not yet permit same-sex marriages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Court of Appeals ruled 7-0 that couples who have a valid marriage from another state can divorce in Maryland. The case involved two women who were married in California and denied a divorce in 2010 by a Maryland judge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ruling may have limited effect because same-sex weddings, and by extension divorces, are set to start in the state in January. However, opponents of the law passed this year are seeking to overturn it in a potential voter referendum in November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;A valid out-of-state same-sex marriage should be treated by Maryland courts as worthy of divorce, according to the applicable statues, reported cases, and court rules of this state,&quot; the court concluded in a 21-page ruling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said Maryland courts should withhold recognition of a valid foreign marriage only if that marriage is &quot;repugnant&quot; to state public policy. The court says the threshold is a high bar that has not been met in the case that it ruled on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lawyers for the women told the Court of Appeals that is would be unprecedented for the state not to recognize gay marriages performed elsewhere.</description>
			<category>Headline Legal News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/963</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Md-highest-court-recognizes-same-sex-divorce#entry963comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:33:13 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court rules NY town&#039;s prayer violated Constitution</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-rules-NY-towns-prayer-violated-Constitution</link>
			<description>An upstate New York town violated the constitutional ban against favoring one religion over another by opening nearly every meeting over an 11-year span with prayers that stressed Christianity, a federal court of appeals ruled Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In what it said was its first case testing the constitutionally mandated separation of church and state, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled the town of Greece, a suburb of Rochester, should have made a greater effort to invite people from other faiths to open monthly meetings. The town&#039;s lawyer says it will appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1999 through 2007, and again from January 2009 through June 2010, every meeting was opened with a Christian-oriented invocation. In 2008, after residents Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens complained, four of 12 meetings were opened by non-Christians, including a Jewish layman, a Wiccan priestess and the chairman of the local Baha&#039;i congregation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galloway and Stephens sued and, in 2010, a lower court ruled there was no evidence the town had intentionally excluded other faiths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A town employee each month selected clerics or lay people by using a local published guide of churches. The guide did not include non-Christian denominations, however. The court found that religious institutions in the town of just under 100,000 people are primarily Christian, and even Galloway and Stephens testified they knew of no non-Christian places of worship there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/964</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-rules-NY-towns-prayer-violated-Constitution#entry964comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>German sues Macedonia in EU human rights court</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/German-sues-Macedonia-in-EU-human-rights-court</link>
			<description>A German who claims the CIA illegally whisked him to a secret prison in Afghanistan appeared before Europe&#039;s human rights court Wednesday in what could be the final chapter of a case that has shed light on U.S. practices in the war on terror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khaled El-Masri, who is of Lebanese descent, says he was brutally interrogated at a secret CIA-run prison in Afghanistan for more than four months after being kidnapped from Macedonia in 2003, apparently mistaken for a terror suspect. He says he went on a hunger strike for 27 days and was eventually flown back to Europe and abandoned in a mountainous area in Albania.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having failed with previous legal efforts in Germany, Macedonia and the United States, el-Masri has turned to the European Court of Human Rights as a last resort in the hope that it will declare that Macedonia breached his basic rights, said his lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Mr. El-Masri has spent the last eight years seeking legal redress for the crimes that were committed against him,&quot; James Goldston told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. &quot;There is abundant evidence including data on CIA flights to and from (Macedonia&#039;s capital) Skopje.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authorities in Macedonia have denied any involvement in el-Masri&#039;s alleged kidnapping and sought Wednesday to have the Strasbourg, France-based court dismiss the case. A lawyer representing the small southeast European nation argued that el-Masri was too slow in filing his initial criminal complaint in Macedonia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/965</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/German-sues-Macedonia-in-EU-human-rights-court#entry965comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court turns away PR congressional vote lawsuit</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-turns-away-PR-congressional-vote-lawsuit</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court won&#039;t hear an appeal from residents of Puerto Rico seeking to gain a voting representative in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court turned away the appeal from Gregorio Igartua and other Puerto Ricans on Monday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Territorial status grants residents of Puerto Rico U.S. citizenship, but they pay no federal income taxes and cannot vote in presidential elections. Their congressional representative also cannot vote in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal judge threw out the lawsuit, and the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision, saying that since Puerto Rico was not a state, it could not have a voting member of Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court refused to hear the appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/961</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-turns-away-PR-congressional-vote-lawsuit#entry961comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:49:09 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court says farmers must pay bankruptcy tax</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-says-farmers-must-pay-bankruptcy-tax</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court says a farming family has to pay tax on the bankruptcy sale of their farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court on Monday voted 5-4 for the IRS in its fight with Lynwood and Brenda Hall over their bankruptcy sale of their 320-acre farm in Willcox, Ariz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Halls were forced to sell their family farm for $960,000 to settle their bankruptcy debts. That sale brought about capital gains taxes of $26,000.The Halls wanted the taxes treated as part of the bankruptcy, paying part of it and having the court discharge the rest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IRS objected to that plan, saying all of the taxes must be paid and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco agreed with the tax agency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court agreed with that decision.</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/960</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-says-farmers-must-pay-bankruptcy-tax#entry960comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:48:55 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court won&#039;t hear appeals from Bulger victim family</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-wont-hear-appeals-from-Bulger-victim-family</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court won&#039;t hear an appeal over whether the family of a man allegedly killed by former Boston mob boss and FBI informant James &quot;Whitey&quot; Bulger should get millions of dollars from the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Edward Halloran&#039;s estate, which wants more than $2 million in damages from the FBI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulger and another gang member are alleged to have shot Halloran on the waterfront in 1982. Bulger was an FBI informant at the time, and two judges ordered the FBI to pay damages to the families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the families did not file their claims within the statute of limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>National News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/959</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-wont-hear-appeals-from-Bulger-victim-family#entry959comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:48:43 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court won&#039;t consider giving man new trial</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-wont-consider-giving-man-new-trial</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court won&#039;t consider giving a man convicted in the death of a Texas toddler a new trial because the medical examiner changed her opinion on the cause of death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Neil Hampton Robbins, convicted in the death of 17-month-old Tristen Skye Rivet, who died on May 12, 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the trial, Dr. Patricia Moore testified that Tristen&#039;s death was a homicide caused by asphyxia. But Moore later changed her opinion and said the cause of death was undetermined. Robbins asked for a new trial but the Texas Court of Criminal Appeal refused, saying there is no conclusive evidence of Robbins&#039; innocence and that it wasn&#039;t proven that the state purposefully used false testimony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>National News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/962</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-wont-consider-giving-man-new-trial#entry962comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 09:49:00 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court says illegal immigrants can&#039;t have guns</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-says-illegal-immigrants-cant-have-guns</link>
			<description>A federal appeals court says illegal immigrants don&#039;t have a right to own firearms under the U.S. Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emmanuel Huitron-Guizar of Wyoming pleaded guilty to being an illegal immigrant in possession of firearms after his arrest last year. He was ordered held by immigration authorities at the Natrona County Detention Center in Wyoming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An attorney for Huitron-Guizar appealed the case, saying illegal immigrants are not excluded from possessing firearms like felons and people who are mentally ill, and should have the same rights as U.S. citizens to buy a gun for hunting and protection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver ruled Monday that illegal immigrants have only limited protection under the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huitron-Guizar&#039;s attorney, Ronald Pretty of Cheyenne, Wyo., says he plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.</description>
			<category>Headline Legal News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/956</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-says-illegal-immigrants-cant-have-guns#entry956comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:19:08 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fed court reverses order for VA system overhaul</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Fed-court-reverses-order-for-VA-system-overhaul</link>
			<description>A federal appeals court on Monday reversed its demand that the Veterans Affairs Department dramatically overhaul its mental health care system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A special 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that any such changes need to be ordered by Congress or the president.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 10-1 ruling reversed an earlier decision by a three-judge panel of the same court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The May 2011 ruling had ordered the VA to ensure that suicidal vets are seen immediately, among other changes. It found the VA&#039;s &quot;unchecked incompetence&quot; in handling the flood of post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health claims was unconstitutional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new decision said courts are powerless to implement the fixes sought by two veterans groups that filed the lawsuit against the VA in 2007. The lawsuits alleged that hundreds of thousands of veterans had to wait an average of four years to fully receive the mental health benefits owed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;There can be no doubt that securing exemplary care for our nation&#039;s veterans is a moral imperative,&quot; Judge Jay Bybee wrote for the majority. &quot;But Congress and the president are in far better position&quot; to decide whether and what changes need to be done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Legal Events</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/957</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Fed-court-reverses-order-for-VA-system-overhaul#entry957comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 11:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Probation charge dropped against tanned NJ mom</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Probation-charge-dropped-against-tanned-NJ-mom</link>
			<description>Court officials say the New Jersey mom accused of taking her then-5-year-old daughter into a tanning booth is no longer on probation in a separate case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patricia Krentcil is free on $2,500 bond on the child endangerment charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The arrest in Nutley got the attention of authorities in Camden County. That&#039;s where Krentcil was sentenced to five years&#039; probation in 1999 for credit card theft, forgery and theft for writing bad checks. In 2001, a bench warrant was issued for her failure to appear at a probation hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Court officials in Camden County on Friday say her probation had been terminated and she would not be required to appear in court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Krentcil is due back in court next month in the tanning case. She says she never took her daughter into a booth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/958</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Probation-charge-dropped-against-tanned-NJ-mom#entry958comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 11:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

