<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:19:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<generator>Tattertools 1.0.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title>US judge denies bid to block NV mustang roundups</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/US-judge-denies-bid-to-block-NV-mustang-roundups</link>
			<description>A federal judge in Nevada who handed horse protection advocates a rare victory last fall has rejected their latest request to block government roundups of free-roaming mustangs in the West, saying they&#039;ll have to go to Congress if they think the animals are being treated inhumanely and need more protection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. District Judge Howard McKibben granted a temporary restraining order on Aug. 30 that cut short by a day a roundup near the Nevada-Utah line after he determined a helicopter flew too close to a horse in violation of the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But he said during a hearing in Reno Thursday that he was denying a new injunction request from the Texas-based Free Wild Horse Federation partly because the Bureau of Land Management has made some positive changes since then. He also said he can&#039;t issue injunctions based on speculation about future abuses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;This court is really not in a position to be the overseer of the BLM,&quot; McKibben said. &quot;This court is not going to police all gathers in the U.S. or even all gathers in the district of northern Nevada.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;This Court is not Congress, not an administrative agency. We are not the first branch of government. We are not the second branch. We&#039;re here to consider grievances,&quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His ruling was a disappointment to horse protection advocates who were buoyed by his court order last fall when he took the BLM to task for its actions at the Triple B complex roundup near the Nevada-Utah line northwest of Ely, Nev.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Headline Legal News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/900</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/US-judge-denies-bid-to-block-NV-mustang-roundups#entry900comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:07:24 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>US Supreme Court won&#039;t review Venezuela suit</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/US-Supreme-Court-wont-review-Venezuela-suit</link>
			<description>An Ohio investment group&#039;s lawsuit seeking to collect $100 million on three-decade-old Venezuelan promissory notes is headed back to a federal judge for further deliberations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decision by the U.S. Supreme Court not to hear the case was a setback for Venezuela, which argued that federal law protects it from U.S. lawsuits because it is a foreign state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court declined on Monday to accept Venezuela&#039;s appeal of a 2010 federal appeals court decision that said the suit filed by Skye Ventures of Columbus could go forward in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also said a lower court must determine whether the case should be tried in Venezuela, which will be the next step.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Skye seeks payment on the notes from a defunct government-sponsored bank.</description>
			<category>National News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/899</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/US-Supreme-Court-wont-review-Venezuela-suit#entry899comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:06:57 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NY court: Judge can&#039;t block $18B Ecuador judgment</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/NY-court-Judge-cant-block-18B-Ecuador-judgment-1</link>
			<description>A judge overstepped his authority when he tried to ban enforcement around the world of an $18 billion judgment against Chevron Inc. for environmental damage in Ecuador, a federal appeals court said Thursday as it explained why it lifted the ban last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the judge has authority to block collection if Ecuadorean plaintiffs move against Chevron in New York, but law does not give him authority &quot;to dictate to the entire world which judgments are entitled to respect and which countries&#039; courts are to be treated as international pariahs.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The judgment came last February after nearly two decades of litigation that stemmed from the poisoning of land in the Ecuadorean rainforest while the oil company Texaco was operating an oil consortium from 1972 to 1990 in the Amazon. Texaco became a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron in 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chevron obtained an order from U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan last March blocking Ecuadorean plaintiffs from trying to collect the $18 billion until he could stage a trial to determine if the judgment was obtained fairly.</description>
			<category>Headline Legal News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/898</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/NY-court-Judge-cant-block-18B-Ecuador-judgment-1#entry898comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:39:50 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>More charges filed in Los Angeles arsons case</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/More-charges-filed-in-Los-Angeles-arsons-case</link>
			<description>A German man pleaded not guilty Tuesday to additional charges accusing him of setting nearly 50 fires, mostly to parked cars, which terrorized parts of Los Angeles over the New Year&#039;s weekend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deputy Public Defender Gustavo Sztraicher entered the plea in Superior Court on behalf of Harry Burkhart, who spoke only to identify himself and acknowledge that he understood the legal process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bail was set at $7.5 million, and Burkhart was scheduled to return to court March 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outside court, Sztraicher had no comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier in the day, the criminal complaint against Burkhart was amended to include a total of 100 arson-related counts involving 49 fires in Hollywood, West Hollywood and the San Fernando Valley. If convicted, the 24-year-old faces more than 80 years in state prison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rash of fires left residents on edge between Dec. 30 and Jan. 2 as parked cars were torched during the night. Some of the fires spread to carports and nearby buildings, including a former home of Doors singer Jim Morrison, and rousted people from their beds. Another one of the blazes was at the Hollywood and Highland entertainment complex, a popular tourist destination bordered by the Walk of Fame.</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/896</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/More-charges-filed-in-Los-Angeles-arsons-case#entry896comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court upholds murder conviction in toddler&#039;s death</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-upholds-murder-conviction-in-toddlers-death</link>
			<description>Georgia&#039;s top court has unanimously upheld the murder convictions and life prison sentences given to a metro Atlanta couple for strangling and beating to death the woman&#039;s young daughter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Georgia Supreme Court&#039;s decision on Monday involved the December 2008 death of Makayla Mack, who was 2 ½ when she was taken to the hospital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An autopsy revealed she had hair loss, bruises and other signs of abuse, and Coweta County prosecutors charged Thomasina Mack and DeMario Steven Smith with her death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two were tried jointly in April 2010 and the jury found them guilty of murder and cruelty to children, sentencing them both to life in prison. Both appealed, but the Georgia Supreme Court&#039;s opinion found the evidence was sufficient to find them &quot;guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/895</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-upholds-murder-conviction-in-toddlers-death#entry895comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:17:58 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court overturns Calif. slaughterhouse law</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-overturns-Calif-slaughterhouse-law</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court on Monday blocked a California law that would require euthanizing downed livestock at federally inspected slaughterhouses to keep the meat out of the nation&#039;s food system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court ruled that the state&#039;s 2009 state law was blocked from going into effect by federal law administered by the Agriculture Department&#039;s Food Safety and Inspection Service. .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Federal law &quot;precludes California&#039;s effort ... to impose new rules, beyond any the FSIS has chosen to adopt, on what a slaughterhouse must do with a pig that becomes non-ambulatory during the production process,&quot; said Justice Elena Kagan, who wrote the court&#039;s unanimous opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
California strengthened regulations against slaughtering so-called &quot;downer&quot; animals after the 2008 release of an undercover Humane Society video showing workers abusing cows at a Southern California slaughterhouse. Under California law, the ban on buying, selling and slaughter of &quot;downer&quot; cattle also extends to pigs, sheep and goats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But pork producers sued to stop the law, saying the new law interfered with federal laws that require inspections of downed livestock before determining whether they can be used for meat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>National News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/894</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-overturns-Calif-slaughterhouse-law#entry894comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:23:06 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New York Securities Litigation Law Firm - Herskovits PLLC</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/New-York-Securities-Litigation-Law-Firm-Herskovits-PLLC</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=http://www.herskovitslaw.com&gt;&lt;h4&gt;New York Securities Litigation Law Firm&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are trusted advisors for litigation and regulatory enforcement matters. When disputes arise – in the enforcement, customer and employment context – we are skilled negotiators, using every available resource to protect our clients and minimize disruption to their business.  When litigation is unavoidable, however, we are tenacious advocates with time-tested experience before state and federal courts and regulatory bodies, and in a broad range of arbitration and mediation settings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leveraging decades of collective experience in the financial services sector, our firm was established to help clients respond to this rapidly changing environment and highly complex marketplace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please click the links below to learn more about our law firm&#039;s practice areas:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.herskovitslaw.com/new-york/securities-litigation-and-arbitration&quot;&gt;Securities Litigation and Arbitration&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.herskovitslaw.com/new-york/securities-industry-regulatory-defense&quot;&gt;Securities Industry Regulatory Defense&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.herskovitslaw.com/new-york/broker-dealer-advisory-services&quot;&gt;Broker-Dealer Advisory Services&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.herskovitslaw.com/new-york/securities-industry-employment-litigation&quot;&gt;Securities Industry Employment Litigation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.herskovitslaw.com/new-york/commercial-litigation&quot;&gt;Commercial Litigation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
			<category>Legal Marketing</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/893</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/New-York-Securities-Litigation-Law-Firm-Herskovits-PLLC#entry893comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:22:49 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>US high court: warrant needed for GPS tracking</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/US-high-court-warrant-needed-for-GPS-tracking</link>
			<description>The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that police must get a search warrant before using GPS technology to track criminal suspects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ruling represents a serious complication for law enforcement nationwide, which increasingly relies on high tech surveillance of suspects, including the use of various types of satellite technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A GPS device installed by police on Washington nightclub owner Antoine Jones&#039; Jeep helped them link him to a suburban house used to stash money and drugs. He was sentenced to life in prison before the appeals court overturned the conviction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Associate Justice Antonin Scalia said that the government&#039;s installation of a GPS device, and its use to monitor the vehicle&#039;s movements, constitutes a search, meaning that a warrant is required.</description>
			<category>Headline Legal News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/892</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/US-high-court-warrant-needed-for-GPS-tracking#entry892comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:22:10 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court throws out judge-drawn Texas electoral maps</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-throws-out-judge-drawn-Texas-electoral-maps</link>
			<description>The Supreme Court on Friday threw out electoral maps drawn by federal judges in Texas that favored minorities. The decision ultimately could affect control of the U.S. House of Representatives and leaves the fate of Texas&#039; April primaries unclear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The justices ordered the three-judge court in San Antonio to come up with new plans that pay more attention to maps created by Texas&#039; Republican-dominated state Legislature. All four of the state&#039;s new congressional seats could swing based on the outcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Supreme Court did not compel the use of the state&#039;s maps in this year&#039;s elections, as Texas wanted. Only Justice Clarence Thomas said he would have gone that far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court&#039;s unsigned opinion thus did not blaze any new trails in election law or signal retreat from a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, as some supporters of the law feared would result from this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, the outcome appeared to favor Republicans by instructing the judges to stick more closely to what the Legislature did, said election law expert Richard Hasen, a professor at the University of California, Irvine, law school.</description>
			<category>National News</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/891</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Court-throws-out-judge-drawn-Texas-electoral-maps#entry891comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Colo. court weighs energy leases near Utah parks</title>
			<link>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Colo-court-weighs-energy-leases-near-Utah-parks</link>
			<description>A federal appeals court must decide if the Obama administration gave energy companies sufficient notice that it was scrapping oil and gas leases auctioned off near national parks in Utah in the closing days of the Bush presidency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sale near Arches and Canyonlands national parks and Dinosaur National Monument was protested by environmentalists, including Robert Redford, and prompted an act of civil disobedience by a University of Utah student who entered the bidding and drove up prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Energy companies are trying to win back the leases and asked the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver on Thursday to reconsider whether a news conference by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar soon after President Barack Obama took office counts as public notice of his final decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government argues that the Feb. 4, 2009, announcement and an internal memo two days later served as notice. The energy companies claim that the new administration didn&#039;t follow typical notification procedures and that the decision wasn&#039;t final until the Bureau of Land Management carried out Salazar&#039;s decision on Feb. 12, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<category>Recent Cases</category>
			<author> (News)</author>
			<guid>http://www.legalnewspost.com/890</guid>
			<comments>http://www.legalnewspost.com/entry/Colo-court-weighs-energy-leases-near-Utah-parks#entry890comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:09:25 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

